the home of online investigations

You can support the work of Bellingcat by donating through the following link:

Debunking Maps of Alleged “Islamic No Go Zones” in London

November 9, 2018

By Dan Kaszeta

Translations: Русский

Various right-of-centre political commenters have, at different times, alluded to the existence of so-called “Islamic no go zones” in Western Europe. Generally, these are defined broadly and variously areas where the local authorities do not have effective police presence, a majority of the local population is Muslim, and “Sharia law” is in effect. Some commenters go as far to state that white people and/or non-Muslims are physically excluded, that there are borders and barriers, or else that Sharia patrols enforce them.

A wide variety of social media accounts and alt-right websites have alleged the existence of such zones in London. The author of this post devotes considerable effort to debunking such theories, as nearly every Londoner finds the very concept absurd. Numerous maps and articles have been posted, alleged to be “proof” or “evidence” of the existence of these so-called “Islamic no go zones.” This post is meant to serve as a resource debunking of such fake “evidence.”

Example 1: Tower Hamlets, Newham, and Waltham Forest

This particular map implies that three London Boroughs are actually no go zones and has been sent to me several times. Looking at published demographic statistics from government sources, the combined population of these boroughs is approximately 932,000 people. These are, indeed, some of the most heavily Muslim areas of the country. However, the combined three boroughs are approximately 30% Muslim. 70% of the shaded area is non-Muslim. Every major religion is present in these three boroughs, with literally hundreds of churches and a number of synagogues easily found through a simple Google search. How this area can be “Muslim only” when hundreds of thousands of non-Muslims live there and hundreds of thousands more commute to work in these areas is not explained. These figures, meanwhile, are approximate, given that the last census was in 2011.

All three boroughs have numerous outlets to sell alcohol, both for on premises and off premises consumption. For example, one can apply here for a licence to sell alcohol in Waltham Forest. The borough of Newham contains one of the largest shopping malls in London, an international airport, and was the site of numerous Olympic venues. The borough of Tower Hamlets contains the Tower of London (hence its name), visited by millions, and a very large banking district (Canary Wharf) which engages in non-Islamic finance (some financial institutions in Canary Wharf have branches or divisions that provide financial products compliant with Islamic finance practices in addition to their normal lines of business).

A brief internet search indicates that the above map actually comes from a far-right blog site called “British Nationalist.” It was posted in 2011.

(All of the links to odd far right sites in this post have been done through so as not to improve their position on search engine results)

Example 2: Tower Hamlets City of London Notice

In early 2018, I was send this notice by three correspondents, claiming that it was an official police notice. This notice purports to notify people that, as of 29th June 2013, the London Borough of Tower Hamlets is a no go zone and that people will be arrested for entering it.

First of all, the tagline “Islam is for Cretins” should be an indicator that this is not a public document. More to the point, this fake notice relies on fundamental ignorance about policing in London. Many people outside of London do not realise that London has several police forces. The City of London Police is not the same thing as the London Metropolitan Police. The City of London Police only serve as the police in the one square mile region of The City of London, which is only a small part of greater London. The rest of London, including the area covered in this map, is under the jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Police. Whoever made this flier did not even grasp this basic fact.

An interesting fact about this map is that it includes the entire Canary Wharf region, which is a very large financial district, as pictured below. (Photo courtesy R. Kaszeta)

A bit of internet research yields the interesting fact that this flier seems to have been circulated by a right-wing blog called “Gates of Vienna” (link) which in turn claims to have got it from someone’s Facebook page.

Example 3: The Acid Attack Map

This map was originally published in the UK tabloid “The Sun” in December 2017 (here). The actual article, by Hugo Gye, talked about some moped delivery drivers having areas they preferred not to deliver to. However, this map has been taken out of context by many commentators who insist on misinterpreting it as picturing “Islamic no go zones.” For example, a right-wing blog called “Creeping Sharia” spread the map and used it imply that these areas of the city are somehow no go zones.

What we see here is a combination of two interesting trends. One is the conflation of caustic liquid attacks, erroneously called “acid attacks” (many attackers use caustic substances that are not, in fact, acids), with Islam. The BBC analysed the statistics on such attacks in a useful article. The majority of perpetrators are either white Europeans or of African/Caribbean descent. South Asians, a demographic category which includes many Muslims, are three times as likely to be the victims as opposed to perpetrators of “acid attacks”.” There’s no evidence tying this form of violence to sectarianism.

The other trend we have to understand is that ANYTHING labeled a “no go zone” will be appropriated by bigots, trolls, and misguided people for their own purposes.

Like the other maps, there is a level of absurdity to the claims that these areas are no go zones. Although this map does not define the catchment areas terribly well, a total of about a million people live in them. Many more commute there for work. One can look at the entry and exit statistics of Transport for London underground stations in the alleged no go zones depicted on the map. At Angel tube station, in the alleged no go zone of Islington, there were approximately 19,200,000 entries and exits from the tube station in 2017. The Camden Town tube station, clearly listed on the map as a “no go zone” had 22,510,000 entries and exits. Quite a bit of coming and going for alleged no go zones.

For live debunking of no go zones, the has live traffic cameras in every one of the alleged no go zones. You can see, any time of day or night, what really happens in these alleged no go zones — i.e. many different people, who are all going about their business.

The actual article in the Sun only focuses on a handful of moped delivery drivers. The words Islam and Muslim are not included in the article. Upon being contacted on Twitter, the author clearly explained that the article was not meant to indicate that these were Islamic no go zones for the general public.

Example 4: The Victoria Exclusion Zone

This is an interesting example. It claims to be from a news agency called “Juno News,” which turns out to be a strange blog as opposed to a news source. In fact, this map originally illustrated a local, temporary police measure against street begging, as reported in December 2013 by the Daily Mail. Instead of some no go zone, it was an area where a police officer had the temporary authority to ask someone begging on the street to move out of the zone.

One thing to note with this particular map is that “Victoria” is misspelled, both when it comes to Victoria Street and Victoria Station. Another thing to note, for those who have never been to London, is that Victoria Station is absurdly busy and is the main entry point in London for arrivals from Gatwick Airport. According to UK government statistics for the financial year 2016-2017, there were nearly 76 million entries and exits to the train platforms in Victoria Station. This does not even account the thousands of people who go through the station for other reasons, such as to go to the bus stops or tothe adjacent underground station.

Example 5: Westminster “No Go Zones”

Finally, this map has been provided as an example of no go zones in the City of Westminster. It is actually a depiction of temporary exclusion areas immediately following the Westminster Bridge attack, where police investigations were ongoing. It is taken from a Daily Mail article in March 2017. These police advisories were lifted very quickly. None of these areas are exclusion areas. Several of these areas can be observed using live traffic camera footage, as explained above.

Overall Conclusions

When one delves beyond the realm of maps and dives into social media, there are clearly many other examples of claims of “no go zones” in London.Perhaps a future post can delve into these if there are sufficient interest. These examples cited above broadly cover the majority of the claims. Indeed, claims based on these maps are generally more detailed than many claims on Twitter, which often use vague terms like “East London” or absurd terms like “Eastern London” (nobody in London uses this term) or “Londonistan.”

Several general trends emerge upon examination. While some claims are fabricated entirely out of whole cloth, others take actual events and either draw odd conclusions or twist them out of proportion. The fact that the London Borough of Tower Hamlets had a Muslim mayor for some years led to odd claims that the area was under Sharia law, deliberately muddling the religion of the mayor with the legal framework of governance. The election of Sadiq Khan as Mayor of Greater London has furthered such claims.

In addition, isolated examples have been taken out of context and purported to be representative of widespread circumstances. For example, three extremists formed an unsanctioned “Sharia patrol” and harrassed people in Bethnal Green, Stepney, and Shoreditch (all areas in East London). These individuals were arrested, tried, and jailed. In another incident, the so-called “Ginger Jihadi” was jailed for similar conduct. Videos of both are routinely circulated as evidence.

The best way to debunk the “no go zone” phenomenon is to go to these areas and either observe or engage in conduct that is obviously not in accordance with strict application of Sharia laws. This author’s own efforts in this area have been well noted in the last year, as shown by this example and this one.

Dan Kaszeta

Dan is the managing director of Strongpoint Security Ltd, and lives and works in London, UK. He has 27 years experience in CBRN response, security, and antiterrorism.

Join the Bellingcat Mailing List:

Enter your email address to receive a weekly digest of Bellingcat posts, links to open source research articles, and more.


  1. Bashar Al Assad

    London is a brilliant and vibrant culturally enriched city with somalian rapist’s…turkish heroin dealers….nigerian scammers and thieving roma gypos….
    Why don’t you visit Aleppo 🇸🇾🇷🇺

    • Black Star

      You should try adding little bits of facts in between the lies, comrade “Bashar”. That way they are more believable.

    • kameryn

      Just because the part of London YOU live in is full of these sorts of people doesn’t mean the rest of the city is like that too.

  2. AlgeCiras

    I think that the ‘no-go zone’ is used simply as a buzzword to highlight the notion that immigration and islamification is gotten out of hand in the West. I think that a decade earlier it was used by almost exclusively by traditional extreme right actors. But now extremes are nowhere to be found as such. See, there are no skinheads and NF any longer, for these were combatted into the ground by the authorities all over Europe. What we see here is an ignorant and chaotic wave of nation state actor-supported propaganda and a host of hard-to-understand ideological cliques followed by interestingly large groups of various people. Since it is hard to descript what one is facing, it certainly won’t be easy to confront and suppress it…

      • AlgeCiras

        @John Lanseter Why faux news items need suppressing is out of the scope of a comments section. Besides, dunno what factual support You are mentioning. That there are deliberately faked news or that state-actors involved?

    • Doug Goodman

      Your point? Your are missing the point by focusing on a term rather principle.Sharia law and the concept of domination. by Islam. Iive in a free county we do not stone people for any reason. In my country that “dog won’ hunt. Vernacular phrase

    • Roberd Ford

      Basically what you are saying is that a mixture of people like the ones running the streets in London these days is something wonderful… The EU “managed” to wipe-out the ones who don’t agree with their fascist politics and life is simply amazing, stepping closer to open borders and globalism… Well; that puts you in a category of it’s own and not everybody buys into globalist crap.

  3. PapaLazaroo

    Well, such a map about Rotherham could have been of public interest ( particulary for the local female teenagers )already a couple of years ago, isn’t it? Or maybe a map of Köln’s city center at New Year Eve?
    “Honni soit qui mal y pense”…

  4. Black Star

    The “no-go-zone” story seems to be repeated by racists and other right wing extremists all over the Europe, perhaps all over the globe.

    The story is almost identical everywhere: keywords are muslims, dark sinned people, crime, rape, danger, no police control. No facts are given, but the “no-go-zone” is always some area on the outer skirts of a bigger city. Claims are always easy to debunk, but the people telling them keep repeating them ad nauseam.

    These stories are meant to be believed by people who live outside of cities and who already have prejudicies against foreigners.

    They are probably spread by similar people, although I know of one local political aspirant who keeps claiming his area near a bigger city is such a zone.

    A google search with his name shows pictures of him on happy walks with his friends all over the “no-go-zone”.

  5. Quint

    Debunking fake no-go zones makes sense, as long as we recognize that no-go zones are potentially for real and happening , due to growing immigration and islamisation in Europe.

  6. Bigfoot

    Thank (insert your diety here) Sharia May and Mayor Khan feed Bellingcat data. Otherwise there’d be unnecessary concern amongst the subjects.

  7. Gooooey

    someone said:

    “Tell that to a young girl walking down Brick Lane E1 late on a summers night in a short skirt – and hear the “muslim patrol” say she’s not welcome. May be not a ‘no go zone’ – but tell me what it is. (BTW these cases are well documented)”

    While situations like these have occurred, these are isolated incidents and definitely not the norm.

    I’m an american – never “lived” in London. But my wife from the east-end and I’ve spent significant amounts of time there.

    My wife used to own an ex-council flat at the boundary estate. my longest contiguous stay there was around 5 months. Since then we acquired a new flat in Forest Gate (and my longest contiguous stay there was around 3 months) early last year in 2018.

    The idea that a woman in a short skirt or someone publicly drinking alcohol would be at significant risk of being harassed is ludicrous.

    In forest gate, there are pubs, a sex shop, places selling liquor. People leaving the weekend football matches at the clapton football club openly carry alcohol walking up upton lane lane towards romford rd
    There was even at one point a proper fish and chips place that sold pork hot dogs. The owner claimed that muslims were frequent customers (he maintained separate kitchens and showed it to anyone that had doubts)

    Stop the fearmongering. it distracts from the _important_ issues affecting Tower Hamlets. It ain’t about the muslims…

    but more about gentrification and corporate property developers taking over the borough.

    Back during the fall of 2015, these signs popped all over tower hamlets (posted on fences, on cafe windows, etc, etc)

    it’s titled “Map of Contested sites in Tower Hamlets”.

    Not contested because of “muslims”. It’s contested because it’s in danger of being taken over by corporate interests.

    let’s look at a few of the places marked in the map:

    [balfron tower]

    an article titled “How the Balfron Tower tenants were ‘decanted’ and lost their homes”


    it’s obvious to anyone going there that what happened to it is travesty. a 500+ year old market turned into a glorified “westfield”. I walked through it a few weeks back (early may) and was dismayed the see even the market area turned into a food court 🙁

  8. Gooooey

    One other note about Tower Hamets…

    On my longest stay there (5 or so months) living in the boundary estate, the one group that I grew to despise were the hipsters.

    On friday and saturday nights it was damn near impossible to sleep between 2am to 4am, because of the constant parade of drunken hipsters stumbling home from brick lane (screaming and creating an infernal ruckus) as they passed through arnold circus.

    If there were operating sharia law patrols, I would have at least gotten a good nights rest 😀

  9. Bmccollum

    The UK should have never let sharia law into their country. One does not move to a new country and expect to bring their laws and customs with them. They moved to a new country. They should have to abide by the new countries laws. If the laws and customs of the country you lived are so loved and ingrained into who you are, you should have not bothered and stayed where you was.

    • Olly

      You are telling a truth, but you know well you have mixed lies well into it.

      A form of sharia law is allowed in the UK where it concerns matters such as marriage, divorce and inheritance. It is only in effect when the participants agree. However, women are not stoned to death for adultery in the UK, not do thieves have their hands cut off anywhere in GB. Basically, UK law trumps sharia law in all important matters such as criminal issues. The imams on a UK sharia board rule on religious matters, they have nothing like judge status.

      You are lying by implying that sharia law (or for that matter, Jewish halakha) is generally allowed to override British laws.

      Your post is simply opportunistic nonsense, you haven’t bothered to address the issue under discussion at all, you’ve just seen that the subject is connected with Muslims and stopped by to drop your two penn’orth of Islamophobia.

      You should be ashamed.

      Luckily most people are better persons than you, so your xenophobic aims will never succeed.

    • Dan Kaszeta

      James. Can you explain why or how your comment is relevant to the Bellingcat post on maps?


Leave a Reply

  • (will not be published)

You can support the work of Bellingcat by donating through the following link: