by and for citizen investigative journalists

ISIS’s Somali Franchise Seizes Qandala: Background and Significance

November 6, 2016

By Jacob Beeders

Translations: Русский

On Thursday, October 27, militants from the self-declared Islamic State’s Somali affiliate seized the port town of Qandala, in the semi-autonomous northern Puntland region of Somalia. Eyewitness accounts claim that after cutting off communications, militants faced no resistance as they entered the town. To confirm their capture of the town, ISIS’s propaganda wing released a short video showing several dozen fighters equipped with small arms entering a nearly abandoned town, before raising the group’s back flag over its pre-colonial era fort.

ISIS fighters move into Qandala (Uploaded on Youtube via Radio Qandala)

ISIS fighters move into Qandala (Uploaded on Youtube via Radio Qandala)

A remaining Qandala resident greets an ISIS fighter (Uploaded on Youtube via Radio Qandala)

A remaining Qandala resident greets an ISIS fighter (Uploaded on Youtube via Radio Qandala)

An ISIS fighter waving a banner over Qandala’s Italian colonial fort. (Satellite imagery: Google Earth)

An ISIS fighter waving a banner over Qandala’s pre-colonial fort. (Satellite imagery: Google Earth)

In the immediate aftermath, local authorities claimed that pro-ISIS forces had withdrawn from the town, fearing a counterattack by security forces. By a number of accounts, these claims seem premature, as Somali journalists report continued militant occupation.

Background

Qandala’s capture marks the first instance of ISIS securing control of a town in Somalia. ISIS’s Somalia affiliate formed in October 2015, under the leadership of former al-Shabaab cleric Abdulkadir Mumin. Shortly after his arrival from the UK in 2010, Mumin gained the position of religious leader for al-Shabaab’s Puntland branch, where he is originally from. The British-Somali Mumin was a significant ideologue in the al-Qaeda affiliate, appearing at a number of major events and propaganda videos. After defecting from al-Shabaab, and pledging allegiance to Abu-Bakr al-Baghdadi, the pro-ISIS faction secured the loyalty of no more than two dozen of the 300 al-Shabaab fighters in Puntland. Since their defection, Mumin’s ranks have expanded to several hundred, yet they have since been contained to the remote and desolate Galgala Mountain Range of Puntland. Sympathizers have managed to launch several small attacks outside of the country’s northeast.

While the Puntland Security Force has successfully repelled ISIS attacks and attempts to capture territory in the past, the largest impediment to their growth has come from al-Shabaab. Having affirmed their loyalty to al-Qaeda, despite internal calls to acknowledge the so-called Islamic State, al-Shabaab has aggressively suppressed pro-ISIS members. Al-Shabaab’s Amniyat intelligence and security entity has ruthlessly targeted leaders and foreign fighters expressing pro-ISIS tendencies, preventing ISIS’s metastasis outside its remote camps in Puntland. Even within Puntland, al-Shabaab loyalists managed to chase Mumin’s faction hundreds of miles from their initial base of operations in a series of clashes.

ISIS appears to have exploited a window of opportunity to seize Qandala provided by the distraction and weakness of their opponents. Over the course of the past month, Puntland’s security forces were involved in violent territorial feud with neighboring Galmudug federal state over the administration of Galkayo city. With the focus away from ISIS, Puntland’s forces only lightly defended Qandala, and have taken over a week to stage a response. Additionally, in March of this year, Puntland’s forces conducted an operation against al-Shabaab, codenamed “Danaab”, which allegedly resulted in hundreds of militants either captured or killed. In turn, pro-ISIS forces were less constrained by the threat of a considerably weakened al-Shabaab branch in Puntland.

Significance  

The coming days will be a major test for Puntland’s security forces, as well as American counterterror efforts in Somalia. America has provided significant material and logistical support for Puntland’s anti-piracy and counterterror forces. The United Nations tracked American clandestine support for Puntland’s intelligence and security forces dating back to the onset of the War on Terror. While American backing for Puntland’s intelligence apparatus may have ceased in 2012, support for other security entities has continued.

After a week of preparation, Puntland’s security forces have begun preparations to retake Qandala. Reports are circulating of troop movements, reconnaissance flights, and naval vessels firing on ISIS positions in Qandala. There are conflicting accounts of the nationality of the responsible warships, with eyewitnesses claiming that American vessels were responsible for the shelling, rather than Puntland’s coast guard. Further, a ceasefire recently agreed to by Puntland and Galmudug in the UAE may allow security forces to focus on the pro-ISIS threat, rather than territorial disputes.

If ISIS forces manage to hold the town, they can gain access to the resources of ISIS-affiliates in Yemen through the Gulf of Aden. Puntland’s former intelligence director, Abdi Hassan Hussein, claimed this was the likely rationale for Qandala’s capture, stating, “They constantly receive experts or trainers from Yemen, and shipments of weapons and other materiel. This is why they selected that strategic area”.

Qandala’s strategic location in Somalia (Satellite imagery: Google Earth)

Qandala’s strategic location in Somalia (Satellite imagery: Google Earth)

Qandala also provides strategic value to ISIS due to its naturally defensible position. The town is nearly inaccessible from land, as it is surrounded by mountains and serviced by only one vulnerable dirt road. In turn, recapture would likely entail a more risky naval assault. If Puntland manages to retake the town, ISIS will likely fade back to their mountain camps, while securing a notable propaganda victory.

This article has been updated to correctly state Qandala is a pre-colonial fort.

Jacob Beeders

Jacob is a graduate of the Department of War Studies at King’s College London. Jacob’s research focuses are terrorism and counterterrorism policy, with an emphasis on East and Sub-Saharan Africa.

4 Comments

  1. Bahdon

    Please Educate yourself on the history of countries before making outlandish and ignorant claims without research that shows that you are no journalist. The FACT IS: QANDALA’S FORT ARE ALL SOMALI BUILT AND HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH AS A CIVILIZATION SOMALIA IS OLDER ARND RICHER IN HISTORY THAN YOUR LITTLE ITALY… PLEASE INFORM AND READ A LITTLE TRUST ME IT GOES A LONG WAY.

    Reply
  2. Mad Dog

    And so, when was this seemingly modern looking fort built? Are you sure you are not referring to the ruins of an Arabic fort nearby?

    Reply
  3. Peabody

    Perhaps you should have a better understanding of Somali history. Ever hear of Italian Somaliland? It was a colony of the Kingdom of Italy in present-day northeastern, central and southern Somalia. Ruled in the 19th century by the Somali Majeerteen Sultanate and the Sultanate of Hobyo, the territory was later acquired in the 1880s by Italy through various treaties. There is a lot more information on this if YOU simply did your research. Italians may not have built that exact building, but there was a huge Italian influence in the area in the 19th century.

    Reply
  4. Mad Dog

    you may be right on this Peabody, could not find anything about an Arab fort there. Only the earlier ruins.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (will not be published)