by and for citizen investigative journalists

Libya Dawn Going DIY: S-125 SAMs Used as Surface-to-Surface Missiles

April 25, 2015

By Oryx

5346

A lack of spare parts for Libya’s sophisticated weaponry has resulted in a number of interesting conversions by the Libyan National Army and Libya Dawn, both poised to get the edge over the other party. Recent examples of such conversions have included the installment of Oerlikon GDF naval guns on trucks by Libya Dawn and the installment of AK-230 naval guns on trucks by the Libyan National Army.

Libya Dawn, currently in control of Libya’s captital Tripoli and other large cities like Misrata , inherited a large number of surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) found in the vast swats of land it controls in the west of Libya. As there is little to no need to use the SAMs in their originally envisioned role, Libya Dawn began investigating the feasibility of turning some of the SAMs into surface-to-surface missiles. The militant group already gained experience with such conversions when they used several Kh-29 air-to-surface missiles, once equipping Libya’s Su-24s, as unguided rockets near Tripoli.

In a quite surprising move, Libya Dawn transferred at least two complete S-125 SAM brigades along with associated misssiles and equipment to Tripoli in early December 2014 and in early March 2015.[1] [2] While the initial move behind these transfers remained unknown, images now reveal Libya Dawn has begun using the S-125s as surface-to-surface missiles

The missiles, still installed on their (now mobile) original launcher, had their fins at the front removed for a more stable flight path in the unguided surface-to-surface role. More interestingly, the nose was lengthened, possibly to increase the size of the warhead. The original missile only packs a 60 kilograms heavy warhead, which is enough to heavily damage or destroy a potential aerial target but far too light for doing any substantial damage when used in the surface-to-surface role. The warhead might also have been replaced by a regular high explosive one, which is more effective than the original high explosive fragmentational warhead designed to wreck aircraft. Finally, it seems the proximity fuse usually associated with the system has been replaced by more appropriate ones for use against ground targets.

743

The conversion of SAMs to function in the surface-to-surface role by Libya Dawn is actually not a first in the world. Back in 1988, Iraq converted several S-125s to ballistic missiles with an intended range of 200 kilometers. The missile, called al-Barq, was modified to suit the surface-to-surface role by removing the features which enable the S-125 to be such a manoeuvrable missile: the missile’s canards and the radio fuse in the warhead were removed, and the missile’s self-destruct mechanism was disabled.

This conversion proved to be everything but easy as the S-125’s warhead is part of the airframe, and was difficult to modify. Work on the missiles progressed slowly, and although several flight tests were indeed carried out, the achieved range totalled only 117 kilometres with a circular error probable (CEP) of several kilometres. Because of the unsatisfactory results, the project was subsequently terminated in 1990.

15125

Obviously, it is highly implausible Libya Dawn could cobble something together from dusty leftover missiles that would manage to achieve the range or accuracy of even the failed al-Barq, meaning the field conversions likely suffer from both abysmally short range and crippling inaccuracy. However, with more than enough S-125s to scavenge and a civil war that does not appear to be going anywhere, conversions like these will undoubtedly continue.

0324
Oryx

5 Comments

  1. Max

    So there is no meaningfull usecase for this modified missiles in a millitary manner. It is allmost impossible to get a hit on a target and therefore there is no combat value of these modifications.

    These missiles are just working out as terror weaponry against larger agglomerations of targets. In a civil war, i would guess, you neither would find large (in meaning of large areal) formations of troops to target, nor there are well trained reconnaisance and fire control capabilities to carry out any strike against troop gatherings. So concluded, this weapon modifikation is only about getting the ability for terrorising the civilian population.

    I am imagening some 20 idiots standing around a launch site, screeming repetitive “allahu akbar” and feeling way proud when the scrap metal is getting airborne.

    That awaken the cynic in me: isn’t it more effective that these cowards just blow up themselves in the common way?

    Reply
    • Jae

      Or either they chant their holy phrase even while the missile fails after launch, we seen plenty of that.

      Reply
    • Seb

      Its all about propaganda. They put it on youtube that they have fancy big rockets that look cool during launch to impress the weaker minded and potential recruits. The fact that the missile probably only hits a stray bush somewhere in the desert kilometers away from the target doesn’t matter as long as it looks awesome on the video. Combat value is about the same as of a broom-stick, but later wont impress people.

      Reply
  2. cofly

    It’s an interesting and little known fact but the old Nike Hercules antiaircraft missile in the US inventory was also convertible to a ground-to-ground role with nuclear warheads during the cold war and those missiles were in Germany (maybe a few other countries also but I can’t say that for sure).

    Reply
  3. Nuwou

    Why people still use to read news papers when in this technological world
    the whole thing is existing on web?

    My web page

    Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (will not be published)