the home of online investigations

Analysis Of The Park Patriot “Sarin Lab” In The Moscow Region

May 23, 2019

By Dan Kaszeta

Translations: Русский

West of Moscow is a theme park called Patriot Park.  One interesting exhibit at this park is an alleged Sarin production laboratory, said to have been captured in Syria.  But is this really a production rig for the nerve agent Sarin?

Photographs of the “Sarin Lab” courtesy of the Conflict Intelligence Team (CIT)

Sarin Production

Sarin is a complicated substance to make. It is, in fact, more complicated to make than many other nerve agents, and there are numerous production pathways to get from basic materials to Sarin.

All of these production methods lead to the production of a substance called methylphosphonyl dichloride, which I will abbreviate top DC. To produce Sarin, DC needs to be converted to another chemical called methylphosphonyl difluoride, or DF for short. Regardless of the many pathways that lead to DF, they all lead to one of two final steps to get to the production of Sarin molecules. For lack of a better terminology, I will refer to them as Method 1 and Method 2.

Method 1 combines DF with isopropyl alcohol (IPA).  One molecule of DF combined with one molecule of isopropyl alcohol reacts to produce one molecule of Sarin, one molecule of hydrogen fluoride (HF), and heat.  Both the residual HF (which is a dangerous acid) and the residual heat are serious issues.

Method 2 was developed to cope with the problem of residual HF, which in large scale production proved to cause many difficulties, including deaths of production staff and loss of expensive hardware.

This method is more complicated. It combines a specialized mix of DF and DC with the IPA. This reaction combines 2 molecules IPA with 1 molecule of DC and 1 molecule of DF.

This reaction, when done carefully under the right conditions of temperature and pressure, yields 2 molecules of Sarin and 2 molecules of hydrogen chloride (HCl), as well as much heat. This residual HCl is easier to remove by various chemical engineering methods than residual HF, and is less dangerous to work with, but only in relative terms.

In the U.S. production method, this DC/DF cocktail was made by partially conducting the DC to DF conversion process and stopping the reaction when the appropriate ration of DC and DF was reached. This took literally years of trial and error to get exactly right at the U.S. Sarin production facility in Colorado.

The exact ratio of DC to DF is close to, but not exactly, equimolar. The timings, temperatures, and processes to convert DC to a DC/DF blend for this production method are still highly classified. It needs to happen under conditions of high temperature, because DC is a solid at room temperatures.

Unpacking The “Production Lab”

In overall terms, the displayed equipment rig is patently unsuitable for the production of Sarin. To anyone familiar with the well-documented historical processes for manufacture of Sarin in Germany, the U.S., and Japan, this equipment instantly looks inadequate to the task.

Indeed, it is hard to know where to start with this set-up.

There are a lot of things that are not explained in the exhibit display. Elements which are not present cannot, by definition, be evaluated — but their absence can be remarked upon. To be honest, it is quite possible that the persons who constructed this display did not know much about the process and were thus making guesses. There is no visible block diagram or process diagram purporting to show what is going on in this jumble of equipment.

If this is meant to be a Sarin production rig, it is showing only the final steps of the process, the last stages of Method 1 above.

There is no sufficient engineering or process controls for Method 2 to be contemplated. We are forced to assume that components are as marked, and that indicated chemical substances are as they are marked on their label.  However, this may not actually be the case in the reality in the field.  It is commonplace usage in clandestine drug laboratories to store substances in containers not consistent with their labelling.

What Is The Process On Display?

Which parts of the process are being done in which container is unclear. The blue drums are labelled “Reactor for mixing reagents” in English, but in Arabic the script translates to “reagents for reactor mixing” (note: I do not read Arabic and Bellingcat has provided this translation). These two descriptions are inconsistent. We are left with uncertainty as to whether one of the plastic drums is the reactor vessel or the metal cement mixer is the reactor.

It also is questionable why a covert lab would label its components. There are two main possibilities:

 

  1. DF is stored in one barrel and isopropyl alcohol is stored in the other. The two components are combined, along with triethylamine, in the cement mixer.
  2. The DF+IPA reaction is done in one of the plastic drums. The resulting product is then moved to the cement mixer where triethylamine is added.

Either way, there are many problems with these processes and this hardware. These are, in no particular order, described as follows:

The Absence of DF

You cannot make Sarin without DF, yet there is no evidence of any DF present.

The exhibitors have made the presence of isopropyl alcohol and the very optional triethylamine clearly visible, but not DF.

There is no container that looks adequate for storage of DF, which is highly reactive to many substances and even reacts with the ambient humidity in air. DF is not commercially available and cannot be obtained by purchase, as the only sources are closely regulated OPCW-inspected facilities that handle only very small quantities.

If you want DF, you have to make it. The various processes for making DF are complex and dangerous. But there is no indication of the necessary hardware or any process for making or purifying DF in these photographs. Anyone believing that this laboratory produces Sarin is required to assume that DF is already present. This, in turn, demands an explanation of where the DF came from.

The Blue Drums

The blue plastic drums are inherently incapable of handling the IPA-DF reaction.

Often, but not exclusively, produced from polyethylene, such large blue drums are widely used for storing chemicals. These particular drums are rated for storage of food. Their markings show that they are Russian in origin. They were procured by Russian company ZTI, near Moscow.

This raises an important issue. As such drums are ubiquitous around the world, why would a clandestine Syrian rebel group source them from a company in a town just west of Moscow?  The drums came from a company only 60 km away from the exhibition site.

Accordingly to the manufacturer’s website, the drums appear to be made from either low density polyethylene (LDPE) or high density polyethylene (HDPE). This particular material has reasonable corrosion resistance.

Could a low density polyethylene drum be corrosion resistant enough for one or two production runs of Sarin? It is possible, although this material is not ideal for the purpose. The issue becomes one of heat and pressure.  Polyethylene drums lose their structural integrity at higher temperature. They can withstand 80 degrees C, but can only stand 90 degrees C for a short period of time. The chemical compatibility of LDPE and HDPE is explained here.

Both the DF-IPA and DF-water reactions produce heat. Because the drums are pressurized, apparently with nitrogen gas or some other gas from the gas cylinders, the barrels will be under pressure.

It seems odd to pressurize a drum not designed for such use. The addition of heat and HF from the Sarin will greatly add to the pressure inside these barrels.

Such a drum will either burst or vent dangerous gases in a Sarin production run. It seems unwise and unsafe to use an LDPE or HDPE drum for the Sarin reaction. In addition, there is no visible mixing mechanism in the plastic drums.  It is unclear how mixing could occur.

The drums, on the other hand, could be suitable for storage of IPA and DF. DF is a difficult substance to store safely, as the U.S. military discovered during its own nerve agent manufacturing programme. DF’s preferred storage material is high density polyethylene (HDPE), a fact which is publicly published. The suitability of LDPE for storing DF is unclear in the available literature.

The Cement Mixer

Given the lack of mixing, the inconsistent labelling, and the fact that both of the plastic drums can’t both be used for the main DF-IPA reaction, the use of a modified cement mixer is extremely problematic for the DF-IPA reaction.

Anyone who has seen how a cement mixer such as this works knows that the mixer drum rotates. A sample video is here.

How are those improvised hose attachments going to work when the drum rotates? The input hoses are going to wrap around the mixer. They will break and spew chemicals everywhere.

Also, with the cover bolted shut, it is not clear how the end product is going to be removed. The metal mixer will get very hot very quickly.

There appears to be a vent on the left side. This will spew hot HF and Sarin in every direction while spinning. In addition, the HF and DF will attack the metal.  Specialty metals are needed to contain a binary Sarin reaction for very long.

It is, on the other hand, possible that the intended use is not for the drum to rotate. This seems odd, as there is no other mixing mechanism visible or implied. It seems very likely that this mixer will fail, and fail catastrophically.

Connections And Fittings

Although the polyethylene drum will provide some corrosion resistance to the HF, the various fittings going into and out of the drum will not survive the HF or the DF. HF and DF are not kind to metal.

It should also be noted that the fittings on the gas cylinder have Cyrillic characters on them, indicating likely Russian origin. Why would a Syrian rebel chemical warfare effort source gas cylinder fittings from Russia, which would only highlight suspicion?

PPE

The protective equipment that the mannequins are wearing is not sufficient to safely handle the Sarin manufacturing process.

While the “Tyvek” suits and military filter-based protective mask are going to provide adequate protection against Sarin vapours and droplets, what they will not protect against is exposure to the Sarin components. Leaking HF vapour will most assuredly attack the skin of the person wearing that PPE, as the Tyvek is not an airtight suit.

Would the masks provide some protection to the respiratory tract? Likely. But will it protect someone for a protracted period of time while working in an enclosed space?  Unlikely.

The gloves may not be adequate for triethylamine.  It is not clear what type of glove is being showcased.

Temperature Controls

There is no hardware in evidence for controlling the temperature of any of the process. The heat produced in the reaction is going to do bad things if it isn’t controlled. The DF/IPA reaction is likely to produce enough heat to boil the contents of either the plastic barrel or the cement mixer. Either would lead to catastrophic failure. The sign on the exhibit claims that the process operates at 25 deg C. This is absurd.

Packaging And Labelling Of Chemicals

Neither of the containers appears to be the original container from the manufacturer. Safety information, in English, seems to be printed out and taped to the containers. We are left to assume that they are correctly labelled. But literally anything could have been in these containers.

The Alcohol

The pictured isopropyl alcohol does not appear to be the high purity required for safety and efficiency of the DF-IPA reaction.

For this reaction to work, it needs to be as close to 100% pure and completely free of moisture, particularly since DF reacts very badly with water. There is nothing shown in this production rig for purifying lower grades of IPA.

There’s no way that the pictured container contains 100% pure IPA, because the fluid level is clearly visible in the container. 100% pure IPA will rapidly absorb moisture out of ambient air. If you use this particular alcohol in the picture in a Sarin reaction, it is likely that there will be problems in the process. You will certainly produce Sarin, but quality and safety degrade quickly and you will need a more robust reaction vessel than the one illustrated.

DF reacts almost instantaneously to form HF and another acid.  Any molecule of DF that reacts with water instead of IPA reduces the overall purity of the end product as that molecule is used up to make residue products instead of Sarin. Also, this water-DF reaction produces excess heat, which will add to the overall heat in the reaction vessel. In summary, use of the pictured alcohol makes the pictured reactor vessels inadequate.

Triethylamine

Various amine compounds have had a reasonable track record as acid reducing additives to Sarin. This topic has already been well explored on Bellingcat.

A thorough search of the technical literature will show that triethylamine is useful as a Sarin additive.  It should be noted that this knowledge comes from the UK Sarin programme in the 1950s and is based on Sarin produced by Method 2.

It should be noted, however, that triethylamine’s safety is questionable in an improvised laboratory situation.

The physical characteristics of triethylamine make it a fire hazard. It is highly volatile and gives off vapours. It has a low flash point and a lower explosive limit that make it quite dangerous near any kind of heat source or spark. Given the possibility of a spark, increased temperatures due to exothermic reactions, and the likelihood of triethylamine vapours venting from the alleged mixing vessel, a fire or explosion is a distinct possibility. Also, triethylamine is corrosive to many types of plastics, rubbers, and  metals.

Conclusion

Based on all available evidence, it is highly unlikely that this exhibit is actually a production laboratory for Sarin. While it may be fascinating for casual visitors to Patriot Park, it does not pass the authenticity test.

I acknowledge the help of several chemists, including DDTea in the preparation of this post. Thank you.

Dan Kaszeta

Dan is the managing director of Strongpoint Security Ltd, and lives and works in London, UK. He has 27 years experience in CBRN response, security, and antiterrorism.

Join the Bellingcat Mailing List:

Enter your email address to receive a weekly digest of Bellingcat posts, links to open source research articles, and more.

Support Bellingcat

You can support the work of Bellingcat by donating through the below link:

47 Comments

  1. jon

    Has this report been funded by Integrity Initiative – just asking, because as a UK taxpayer I like to know where my money is going.

    Reply
    • Dan Kaszeta

      Nope. My work for the Integrity Initiative is completely separate from the work that I do for Bellingcat. S

      Reply
    • oui oui

      as a UK taxpayer you would not be happy with your money used to show the russian way of li.e
      they are disturbing the life of your country , you know , trolls lying for brexit by example because these russians would be the stronger in a divided Europe , what would change them of what they are now , and what would change the life in Europe
      if you want to live like that or are okay with others living like that find a psy
      it’s a war not saying it’s name , as frank as the russians doing that can be frank , being friends with these schizophrenics is really a treason
      even as a russian taxpayer you could agree , it’s an exhibit of what is going on in Russia , you just have to realize it

      Reply
      • Andrew

        Oui Oui, your post is sounding very russophobic. You call Russians in general ‘schizophrenic’ and all but challenge them to an EU vs Russia showdown. I find that disturbing.

        Reply
  2. jacabikap

    There are many who will argue the greater benefits of social media while ignoring other alternatives to the menace it has become to the very structure of societies all around the world. People are becoming increasingly complacent and isolated into idealized groups with no room for compromise and understanding of other views. The reason history repeats itself if become as intelligent we view ourselves as humans, the reality is far from it. We forget the mistakes of past generations, and clearly that is not an attribute of an intelligent species, that knowing the consequences of an action we still pursue it. We all go on living as if we own this world and yet forget we all have one fate – death awaits us all. In the end it is what you did while alive that matters. What are each one of you doing with your lives?

    Reply
    • loupgarous

      “What are each one of you doing with your lives?”

      Thinking critically. Good job, Mr. Kazzeta.

      Reply
  3. Sean D

    Triethylamine will react with any HF or HCl produced to form respectively triethylamine hydrofluoride (triethyl ammonium fluoride) and triethylamine hydrochloride (triethyl ammonium chloride). The nitrogen cylinder is colour-coded as nitrogen and the 2-stage regulator looks correct.

    The chemicals do not appear to be of fine chemical quality so expect acetone, MEK, 1-propanol & methanol all to be present in the IPA. In fact, the MSDS stickers on the vessels strongly suggest that the chemicals were decanted into general purpose containers & labelled i.e. industrial solvents.

    DF & DC are highly reactive & DF has a BP of just 55.4C so temperature control is vital and given their toxicity, I don’t think even the most suicidal supplier would store in a general purpose 200L HDPE vessel. That said, no DF is displayed.

    I suggest that you have mis-identified a modified addition vessel as a cement mixer. That said, the modification looks inappropriate since pressure sealing the reaction vessel isn’t possible.

    All in all, this setup wouldn’t be acceptable to clandestine chemists working with much less hazardous materials. Given the physical properties of sarin, the workspace would be lethal even if the reaction was carried out in the presence of a high-volume air extraction system (car respray shops are commonly used).

    In my opinion it doesn’t look very realistic. While I appreciate that Syria might not have been able to acquire the equipment that a bespoke facility would offer, they would surely be able to obtain a glass-lined reactor with an overhead stirrer. The most crazed radical would baulk at working with such a crude setup and any chemist capable of carrying out the work would work out a better system; if only to keep themselves alive to complete the work.

    Obviously their is a vast amount of detail missing but of what their is, too much is too wrong. It may be possible to produce one of the heavier (less volatile) mustards in a crude manner, I don’t believe this to be the case with sarin.

    Reply
  4. Sergey

    We — the older Russians — are back to the mindset of the 80s, when we used to sit around the kitchen table with a bottle of vodka and talk about the lies surrounding us in our lives, especially those coming from the blue TV screens.
    The only difference is that the leader of the nation can now say things that are 100% opposite of the truth without even blinking an eye, something unheard of in the Brezhnev era.

    Reply
  5. Tracey Thakore

    After doing my own research on the Novichock incidents, and the subsequent press coverage, it appears to me to you are displaying a fake or if you will “staged” set of photographs. Propoganda anyone?

    Reply
    • Bob

      Did you read the article? The chap states this isn’t a real production facility…it was mocked up by the russkis

      Reply
    • Dan Kaszeta

      Dear Tracey,

      Did you read the article?

      The entire point of my post here is that the Russian Patriot Park exhibit is, in fact a fake. These are not staged photos. They are real photos of a faked “lab” that cannot make Sarin. Also, this has nothing to do with so-called Novichoks. Please do try to keep up.

      Reply
  6. Tracey Thakore

    So why write about “chemical weapons,” publishing facts and figures that only an advanced chemist would be interested in, when you trivialise the knowledge of those with a broader outlook?

    Reply
  7. Tracey Thakore

    You write about the “theme park” Patriot Park in Moscow, an alleged Sarin production laboratory, but you yourself ask “is it real ?” You then go on to question is it a production rig for the nerve agent Sarin ? Whilst it is obviously a mock up of some sort, you then go on to write about the manufacture of such a process. Whilst browsing through “Bellingcat,” I can’t help but notice that the majority of features are independently written with no political bias but to inform, whilst some of the other articles seem to cater not only for those with a general sense of the world, but cater for those with an aim other than to inform a greater audience.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (will not be published)