the home of online investigations

You can support the work of Bellingcat by donating through the following link:

It’s In The Lebanese President’s Hands, Literally

October 30, 2019

By Marwan Khoury

It did not take more than a few minutes for the Lebanese people to notice something was wrong with their president. This was reflected in a speech that took place last Thursday, October 24, and came eight days after the start of nationwide protests against him and other rulers in Lebanon.

A photo that showed a sudden change in the background, more specifically a change in the configuration of the books behind President Michel Aoun, started spreading online, notably through social media and conventional media outlets, as well as through the phone messaging application WhatsApp.

Image from online Newspaper Al Modon, dating from 24/10/2019

While the reality is that any astute person would have suspected that the speech was edited, the previous image, which stresses the allegedly moving books, ended up being a useful misinformation tool. It’s not the books that we should worry about here, and I will show as much below.

Here we must keep in mind that there is a difference in suspecting that a video was edited and setting out to prove as much.

Twitter activist and President Aoun supporter, @Jay_Aoun, tweeted an image that claims to debunk the idea that the books have moved — by explaining why the books in the background may look different without necessarily having been moved. According to him, the first camera is facing the president and therefore hiding the leaning books behind him, while the second camera is shooting at a 45 degree angle, showing the leaning books behind his back.

Tweet from username @Jay_Aoun on 24/10/2019

A closer review of the footage shows that the books did not in fact move, but that, on the contrary, lots of efforts were made to keep everything the same throughout the multiple, edited passages.

Here is the YouTube video uploaded to President Michel Aoun’s channel on 24/10/2019:

What betrayed all the efforts at hiding the president’s inability to deliver an unedited ten-minute-and-forty-two-seconds speech was the president himself. More specifically, his hands.

While he is sitting behind his desk, the location of his hands and fingers around the desk pad varies within a split second almost every time the camera cuts to a new angle, and without him making that transitional movement.

This is an impossible scenario for a single take, and instead suggests heavy editing: splicing from various takes and combining them for the best possible effort to project a continuous speech. This abrupt, unexplained change in hand location happened eight times out of ten camera changes — not counting the return to the original angle —  and therefore suggests the possibility of using different versions of the recorded speech at varying intervals, ranging from nine seconds to three minutes and 42 seconds, or the need to edit out intermediate passages.

The first edit was proved to happen 44 seconds after the start of the speech as seen below, with President Aoun’s hands changing in the same second (at 0:44) between the two camera angles:

While another change of camera angle was observed at one minute and 40 seconds (1:40), the lack of significant variation in the hands’ configuration could not prove that any edits were made in this particular instance:

A second edit was demonstrated at one minute and 58 seconds (1:58), again with the different camera angles showing different hands’ positions within the same second:

The third edit came only nine seconds after the second one, which is at two minutes and seven seconds (2:07):

The fourth at edit is seen at three minutes and 21 seconds (3:21):

The fifth edit at four minutes and 55 seconds (4:55):

The sixth proven edit came at the fifth minute and 49 seconds (5:49):

The seventh edit came at six minutes and six seconds (6:06):

At minute seven and 42 seconds (7:42) a lack of changes concerning the hands does not allow one to prove that an edit occurred at the switch-off between the cameras:

And finally, the last edit came at nine minutes and two seconds (9:02):

What Does This Prove?

First of all, this proves that the president’s last speech was not broadcast live, as presented by many Lebanese and international television stations.

The word “Live” in Arabic is seen in the purple circles

More importantly, it proves that the president could not deliver an unedited ten-minute speech. There are two scenarios that may explain this result. The first one is that he could not read his own speech at once, therefore needing at least two different trial runs (and possibly more) that were filmed at two different angles, with the presidential palace’s editors having to pick the acceptable passages from the multiple versions and combine them into one. The second possibility is that this is a longer presidential speech with at least eight passages spliced out of it.

Why Is This Important?

A speech that is addressed to the nation is, for a politician, one of the most important methods of communication. This one in particular comes eight days after widespread street protests calling for the whole nation’s regime to change and for every leader’s resignation. 

It also comes at a time when Lebanon is facing multiple political, financial, and social crises; ones that require energetic, trustworthy, and accountable people on board. In ancient Egypt, the pharaoh had to prove strength and stamina through successful completion of a course around his court. It is believed that those who could not perform the ritual were deemed unfit for rule. 

The montage offered in lieu of a live speech invites the question of whether the 84-year-old president is capable, or is being transparent enough, in such demanding times — corners about his health have, after all, been raised before — and such concerns now arise beside the fact of the nationwide revolt against his governance.

Marwan Khoury

Marwan Khoury is a forensic scientist who has submitted his PhD thesis on the effects of fire and explosions on forensic DNA to the University of Leicester. He studied in the UK and in Switzerland and trained with Geneva's Judicial Police in the Technical and Scientific Brigade. Marwan believes in a promising collaborative future for forensic science and OSINT.

Join the Bellingcat Mailing List:

Enter your email address to receive a weekly digest of Bellingcat posts, links to open source research articles, and more.

13 Comments

  1. George

    This shows us , that the lebanese government is deceiving its own people, and yet they have proved they are thieves,, liars, and CORRUPT,, this monkey AOUN is only a puppet,,cannot rule or do anything unless the maggot
    And terrorist organization HASSAN NASSRALLAH gives him / them the government the okay,,they all have to go, ALL,,and face justice, and as far as the maggot nassrallah, this maggot should be hung in the middle of Beirut, justice can only be served on them MAGGOTS, all,

    Reply
  2. Mohamad

    This proves more your stupid tricks
    Because even in this page you show a picture which had Arabic words and you translated it wrong
    Not because you don’t know how to translate but because you don’t want the truth to be seen

    Reply
  3. Oh boy

    when u get to 80 years old if u should ever that is thank your God you will be able to see and read well.
    it’s unfortunate I’m even wasting my time to come down to your low level

    Reply
  4. Mohamad

    Please try to have a fair look
    Who is the terrorist
    Hassan nassrallah who saved Lebanon from Israel
    Israel in one day in qanna massacre killed hundreds of civilians in a UN barrack
    Is he the terrorist or Samir geagea who had killed a president of Lebanon long time ago
    And he judged in just few years in prison

    Reply
    • Gerhard

      So did Mossad orchestrate his hand movements in the video too? Between Syrian intervention and fractured sectarian politics, Lebanon doesn’t need further help from Israel to look incompetent.

      Reply
    • Nate

      Hezboshaytan got a really costly victory for Lebanon.
      Next time, IDF won’t be as merciful cause they have been grinding their xp

      Reply
  5. Mohamad

    Mr servus thanks
    I was wrong about translating
    I apologise from mr Marwan and everyone who waste time because of my language mistake

    Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (will not be published)

You can support the work of Bellingcat by donating through the following link:

TRUST IN JOURNALISM - IMPRESS